Methodology

A defined editorial process, applied to every file.


DD11's work is delivered against a six-phase process. The same phases apply to biography engagements, Wikipedia advisory and digital-legacy custodianship — differing only in emphasis, not in standard.

Process Overview

Six phases, sequentially applied.


  1. Intake & Confidentiality
  2. Eligibility & Feasibility
  3. Source Audit
  4. Research & Documentation
  5. Editorial Review
  6. Custodianship
Phase Detail

What happens in each phase.


Phase 01
1–2 weeks

Intake & Confidentiality


A confidential intake meeting establishes scope, purpose and confidentiality terms. No research begins before written engagement.

Phase 02
2–3 weeks

Eligibility & Feasibility


For advisory engagements, an initial eligibility assessment against public encyclopedic standards. For documentation engagements, a feasibility review of source availability.

Phase 03
3–5 weeks

Source Audit


Systematic identification of independent, published, secondary sources. Each source is assessed for reliability, independence and depth of coverage.

Phase 04
4–8 weeks

Research & Documentation


Structured drafting of the biographical file, chronology and supporting materials. Every substantive claim is anchored to a citation in the source register.

Phase 05
2–3 weeks

Editorial Review


Independent internal review for neutrality, sourcing quality and factual accuracy. Client review is limited to factual corrections; editorial judgement is retained by DD11.

Phase 06
Ongoing

Custodianship


Ongoing monitoring, periodic updates and a defined correction protocol. Legacy files remain under DD11 editorial oversight for the duration of the engagement.

Standards

The internal editorial tests every file must pass.


  • Sourcing: every substantive claim is anchored to an independent, published, secondary source.
  • Neutrality: encyclopedic register — no superlatives, no promotional framing, no unsourced opinion.
  • Verifiability: readers must be able to locate and confirm every cited source.
  • Independence: DD11 retains editorial control; clients review facts, not tone.
  • Confidentiality: unpublished materials and working papers remain private.